North Dakota

  Civil Rights Attorneys.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
August 24, 2010
Civil-Right
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

North Dakota Civil Rights News

 

Ohio Public Defender Files Civil Rights Lawsuit Challenging Ohio’s Lethal Injection Procedure

(Columbus)—

The Office of the Ohio Public Defender (OPD) yesterday filed a civil rights lawsuit in the Federal Southern District Court of Ohio challenging the constitutionality of Ohio’s lethal injection protocol. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of two Ohio death row inmates, Adremy Dennis and Richard W. Cooey, II.

Ohio’s lethal injection protocol includes a short-term anesthetic and a paralyzing drug, which could combine to leave an inmate conscious but paralyzed, trapping him in a chemical tomb that hides the excruciatingly painful effects of death by suffocation and heart attack. Veterinarians forbid using the same combination of drugs for euthanizing pets, in order to avoid inflicting pain on animals. At bare minimum, the OPD argues that we as a civilized society should not be executing human beings by using drugs veterinarians won’t use to put pets to sleep.

In the lawsuit filed yesterday, the OPD argues that the use of the paralyzing drug, pancuronium bromide, is a violation of Dennis’ and Cooey’s rights to be free from cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution: "[Ohio’s] current method of lethal injection can and will, in effect, cause them to be tortured to death. No government within the United States can intentionally or negligently use an arbitrary, cruel, and/or unreliable method of execution."

The lawsuit goes on to argue that Ohio’s "lethal injection protocol includes an unreliable ultrashort-acting anesthetic that can and will leave [Dennis and Cooey] conscious but trapped in a paralyzed body wracked with the pain of suffocation and a heart attack. [The State of Ohio] intend[s] to execute [Dennis and Cooey] with unreliable and arbitrary drugs, administered by inadequately trained personnel, who use inappropriate equipment and methods to cause death by lethal injection."

Earlier this year, the OPD filed a similar lawsuit on behalf of Lewis Williams and John Glenn Roe. Due to then-existing technicalities, that lawsuit was dismissed without any rulings on the facts, and both Williams and Roe were executed. The OPD believes that the technical barriers to challenging Ohio lethal injection methods were effectively lifted by the United States Supreme Court’s decision on May 24, 2004 in Nelson v. Campbell, where the Court allowed an Alabama death-row inmate to use the civil rights statute to challenge lethal injection procedures.

Contact a North Dakota civil rights lawyer today and get a free consultation!

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
Protected Class are the groups protected from employment discrimination by law


 


  Newsroom  
 


Latest news about Civil Rights cases in North Dakota and nationwide:

Rep. Watson & Black Caucus Members Register Outrage Over Blatant Discrimination By Cherokee Nation
Congresswoman Diane E. Watson and 25 members of the Congressional Black Caucus have sent a letter to the Bureau of Indian Affairs protesting the re...
Read more >


Civil Rights Division Commemorates 100th Agreement Milestone For Project Civic Access
On August 5, citizens from across the nation gathered at the Justice Department to celebrate the signing of the 100th agreement reached through “Pr...
Read more >


Ohio Public Defender Files Civil Rights Lawsuit Challenging Ohio’s Lethal Injection Procedure
(Columbus)—

The Office of the Ohio Public Defender (OPD) yesterday fil...

Read more >


More Civil Rights News >

 
 

Civil Rights Attorneys.com Terms

 


Today's Terms

Disparate Impact

Definition:
Under EEO law, less favorable effect for one group than for another. Disparate or adverse impact results when policies and practices applied to all employees or applicants have a different and more inhibiting effect on one group than they do on another.

Sexual Harassment

Definition:
Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when: Submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term condition of employment; Submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individual; or Such conduct has the purpose or effect or unreasonably interfering with an individual’s work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment.

Age Discrimination

Definition:
Age discrimination is present if an individual covered under this provision is treated unfavorably in the terms and conditions of his/her employment because of his or her age. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) forbids discrimination based on age for those individuals who are 40 years of age or older.

More Civil Rights Attorneys.com Terms >

 

Search Site:

 
 

Civil Rights Resources

 


Search Civil Rights resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

Civil Rights Hot Topics

 
Topics Related to Civil Rights:

  • Criminal Justice
  • Death Penalty
  • Disability Rights
  • Drug Policy
  • Free Speech

More Civil Rights Topics >

North Dakota Civil-Right Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Civil-Right attorney you should contact our Civil-Right Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Bismarck
  • Dickinson
  • Fargo
  • Grand Forks
  • Jamestown
  • Mandan
  • Minot
  • Wahpeton
  • West Fargo
  • Williston
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on North Dakota Civil Rights Attorneys.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.